When Elections Become Selection Processes

When Elections Become Selection Processes

In Somalia’s federal states of Galmudug, Hirshabelle, and South West, growing concerns are emerging over the imposition of preferred candidates ahead of planned elections. What should be a democratic competition increasingly appears, to critics, as a controlled political arrangement rather than a genuine electoral process. This perception risks weakening public trust in institutions that are meant to represent citizens, not political interests.

The constitutional timeline is becoming a central point of tension. President Hassan Sheikh Mahmoud’s term is expected to end on 15/05/2026, and legal experts and political observers emphasize that any extension beyond this date would lack constitutional legitimacy. At the same time, 105 members of parliament have already declared the expiration of their mandate by 15/04/2026, adding further urgency to the demand for a clear and lawful transition.

Centralization of Power and Political Resistance

Another growing concern is the perceived push toward unilateral decision-making at the federal level, particularly regarding constitutional amendments. Critics argue that advancing such changes without broad regional consensus signals an attempt to consolidate authority rather than build national agreement. This approach is deepening political divides and raising questions about the balance of power within Somalia’s federal system.

Delays in setting clear electoral agendas for both regional and presidential elections are fueling frustration across political circles. Many stakeholders are calling for an official and transparent timeline that defines the path forward. Without it, uncertainty continues to dominate the political landscape, making governance more reactive than structured.

Allegations of Influence and Political Financing

Amid the political tensions, allegations have surfaced regarding the use of public resources to secure political loyalty. Critics claim that financial incentives have been used to influence decision-making among political actors. While unverified, such accusations—if left unaddressed—further damage confidence in the integrity of Somalia’s democratic institutions.

At the heart of the current debate is a simple but critical demand: clarity. Somalia’s political actors, regional states, and citizens alike are calling for a transparent electoral roadmap and strict adherence to constitutional limits. Without these safeguards, the risk grows that political uncertainty will overshadow democratic progress, leaving institutions vulnerable to prolonged instability.